Author Archives: Michael Happy

Woodstock, Day 4

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2xnEv9aF60

Jimi Hendrix, “Voodoo Child”

Monday, August 19, 1969: Among those who played Woodstock that four day weekend were Janis Joplin, The Who, the Grateful Dead, Santana, Creedence Clearwater Revival, Jefferson Airplane, and the very unhippie show-stoppers, Sly and the Family StoneJimi Hendrix closed out the concert — to a very small audience because almost everybody else had already gone home.  His performance therefore was sort of like Woodstock’s Woodstock: more people claim they were there than actually were there.  (The one person I know who did go to Woodstock sorrowfully admits that she, like many others, left Sunday afternoon to be home for Monday and so missed this celebrated performance.)

Despite hippiedom’s self-declared ethos of revolution, Frye didn’t see it that way:

The conception of “participatory democracy,” which requires a thorough decentralization, is also anarchist in context.  In some respects this fact represents a political picture almost the reverse of that of the previous generation.  For today’s radical the chief objects of loyalty during the thirties, trade unions and the revolutionary directives of Moscow, have become reactionary social forces, whereas some radical movements, such as the Black Panthers, which appear to have committed themselves both to violence and to racism, seem to descend from fascism, which also had anarchist affinities.  Similarly, anarchism does not seek to create a “working class”: much of its dynamic comes from a bourgeois disillusionment with an overproductive society, and some types of radical protest, like those of the hippies, are essentially protests against the work ethic itself. (“The University and Personal Life,” Spiritus Mundi, 29)

Hendrix’ iconic rendition of “The Star Spangled Banner” after the jump.

Continue reading

Fireworks!

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhUZlokAURQ

Fireworks.  Because every birthday ought to end in fireworks.

So thanks to Bob Denham, thanks (most especially) to Jonathan Cox, and thanks to John Fink for getting Northrop Frye and Critical Method up and running for this first anniversary.  And, of course, many many warm thanks to all of our contributors over the past year.  We hope to see much more of you in our second year.  As well as, of course, as many more new contributors who’d like to join us.

Video of the Day: Arcade Fire

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNfWC4Sgkcs&feature=related

The anthem that brought Arcade Fire to international attention in 2006, “Rebellion (Lies)”

It’s our first birthday today, so let’s have a little fun tonight.

Montreal’s Arcade Fire seems to be the hottest band in the world right now, beloved by everyone from David Bowie to Jon Stewart, on whose show they played two sets last week (and Jon almost never has musical guests).  They also seem to be some of the nicest people you’d care to meet; there are six of them playing three times that number of musical instruments.  They make the cliche about Canadians being sweet tempered and polite a heroic virtue — and explode the myth that that somehow makes us boring.

Their new album, The Suburbs, is at the top of the charts and is receiving rave reviews.  Why, here’s one now.

After the jump, audio of “Month of May” from The Suburbs.

Continue reading

Our First Anniversary

signature-300x73

Today is our first anniversary, and we’re very pleased to be here.

We began celebrating early by posting in its entirety yesterday our beloved benefactor Bob Denham’s first book, Northrop Frye and Critical Method.  It has been brilliantly digitized for easy access and reading by Bob’s former student and our current administrator, Jonathan Cox.  (Our thanks also to our tech support at McMaster Library, John Fink, for posting it.)  You can find it here.  You’ll be delighted to see that all chapters, chapter sections, and diagrams have their own links, and there is always a link to the next chapter in the top right hand corner, as well as link to the previous chapter in the top left.

When we started out a year ago we were simply a “weblog dedicated to Northrop Frye.”  We’re now much more than that.  Besides the daily blog portion of the site (1000 posts in the first 12 months), there is now a journal containing 18 articles that also serves as the archive for Moncton’s Frye Festival.

We have also established the Robert D. Denham Library, which is turning into a singular resource for scholars, students and the reading public.  At this point the library houses too many treasures to itemize, but it includes the complete 10 volumes of Bob Denham’s Northrop Frye Newsletter, previously unpublished material by Frye himself (including the remarkable 5 part, 39 chapter Notes on Romance), various reviews of 20 of Frye’s published works, previously unpublished student class notes and exams from the 1940s and 50s, all of Bob Denham’s introductions to various volumes of the Collected Works, study guides and outlines to The Educated Imagination and The Double Vision, two complete books (now including, of course, Bob’s wonderful Frye and Critical Method), various lectures by Frye scholars, and other Frygiana.  We hope to be posting audio and video of Frye soon.  We also hope that before long we can begin to post student papers and dissertations.

Finally, there is our readership: many hundreds of visits a week and many thousands a month from more than 100 countries around the world.  We figure that, as we become better known, those numbers will only improve, as they seem to do steadily from month to month.

We are, of course, eager to tap into the Frye community at large for still more contributions, and our invitation always stands. We are pleased to note that we offered for the first time full day to day coverage of the Frye Festival in Moncton last April, as well as the Crucified Woman Reborn” conference at Emmanuel College in May. At the moment we are  providing coverage of the effort to save the Centre for Comparative Literature at the University of Toronto.  If, therefore, you’d like to post at the blog or submit an article to the journal or add something to the library, just drop us a line at fryeblog@gmail.ca

Miles Davis: “Kind of Blue”

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlIU-2N7WY4

A live performance of the album’s opening track, “So What” — the tune that is to classic jazz what “Stairway to Heaven” is to classic rock

On this date in 1959 Miles Davis released “Kind of Blue,” the best-selling jazz album of all time.  Fifty-one years later and it still charts!  And why shouldn’t it?  Here’s the lineup: Miles Davis on trumpet, John Coltrane and Cannonball Adderley on saxophones, Bill Evans and Wynton Kelly on piano, Paul Chambers on bass, and Jimmy Cobb on drums.

Oh, and each track is perfect.

After the jump, a 50th anniversary commemoration of the release of the album.

Continue reading

Robert D. Denham: “Northrop Frye and Critical Method”

HotNewsIcon

Admittedly, not everyone cares that it’s Madonna’s birthday — compelling archetypes of ascent and descent notwithstanding — so we have another much more interesting treat in store.

Thanks both to Bob Denham and our very handy administrator Jonathan Cox, we have just posted Bob’s first book, Northrop Frye and Critical Method, in the Robert D. Denham Library.  We’ll have more to say about that as part of our official launch tomorrow.  But go and have a peek at it here.

Madonna

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12wP5W2R0wY

Madonna at her peak with 1989’s “Express Yourself”

Today is Madonna‘s birthday (born 1959).

This entire video is starkly based (as much of the best popular culture is) upon the archetypes of descent (or katabasis) and ascent.  Here’s Frye on katabasis in Frye Unbuttoned:

To descend is to pass through the chattering, yelling, gibbering world of the demons of repression to the quiet spirit below.  As Eliot says, contradicting the Sybill, it not easy to go all the way down.  To reascend is to bind the squalling demons into a unified creative power. (157)

Madonna, in this instance, seems to be cavorting at the top of the chain of being and undermining male authority with her unabashed sexuality, while also waiting for a beleaguered lover to find his way up to her, leaving a hellish world of darkness and violence behind.  Note that the declared intent of the song is not merely to encourage women to express themselves, but to insist that men do the same in order to secure a fully requited love.  This video arguably marks the dawn of Third Wave feminism as a force in popular culture: sex positive and confidently empowered.

I couldn’t find the identical video with the superior electronic remix of the song, but you can listen to it after the jump.

Continue reading

Macbeth

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LDdyafsR7g

Ian McKellen as Macbeth: “Tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow . . .”

August 15th offers two significant and uncannily symmetrical Macbeth anniversaries.

On this date in 1040, Macbeth saw his cousin and rival, Duncan 1, killed in battle, making Macbeth King of Scotland.

Seventeen years later to the day, in 1057, Macbeth himself was killed in battle by a force led my Duncan’s eldest son, Malcolm III of Scotland.

Frye on Shakespeare’s Macbeth as one of the “tragedies of order”:

In each of Shakespeare’s three social tragedies, Julius Caesar, Macbeth, and Hamlet, we have a tragic action based on three main character groups.  First is the order-figure: Julius Caesar in that play; Duncan in Macbeth; Hamlet’s father.  He is killed by a rebel-figure or usurper: Brutus and the other conspirators; Macbeth; Claudius.  Third comes the nemesis-figure or nemesis-group: Antony and Octavius; Malcolm and Macduff; Hamlet.  It is sometimes assumed tht the hero, the character of the title-role, is always at the centre of the play, and that all plays are to be related in the same way as the hero; but each of the heroes of these three tragedies belongs to a different aspect of the total action.  The nemesis-figure is partly a revenger and partly an avenger.  He is primarily obsessed with killing the rebel-figure, but has a secondary function of restoring something of the previous order.  (Fools of Time, 17)