Category Archives: Video

Was the “Miami Model” Used in Toronto?

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6h3nCoNvldk

Police surround and then attack peaceful protesters in Toronto.  In just about every video like this I’ve seen, they very quickly target people filming the event.

Catherine Porter of the Toronto Star explains.

Frye on police power:

But in an atmosphere of real fear and real suspicion the police must become both more efficient and more tolerant if they are to be of any use in defending democracy. Otherwise, they will be not only unjust to individuals, but dangerous to their own community. (Canadian Forum 29, no. 346 [November 1949]: 170)

Saturday Night at the Movies: “The Children’s Hour”

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KK85OYo8HXg

A look back at the days when homosexuality was still criminal and socially stigmatized, but Hollywood was at least trying to open the closet door with mainstream films like The Children’s Hour (1961), based upon Lillian Hellman’s 1934 play.  However, it’s hard not to notice that the limited consideration here is watered down by ambiguity about the lesbian love involved.  Still, it had to start somewhere.

The rest of the movie after the jump.

Continue reading

TGIF: “My Gay Son”

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifUQq5p5i2g

Catherine Tate and her gay son

Sure, Toronto looks like the country’s just undergone a military coup d’etat, but soon the jackbooted security, the concrete barriers and the general misery of the good people of Toronto will be wisked aside as Gay Pride gets seriously underway.  Do you think our prime minister and his po-faced cohort might stick around for that?  It’d no doubt do them some good to appreciate that there are men in this country who can dress up like cowboys too but without any intention of getting on a horse.

“O Canada”

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjiwBwBL4Qo

Classified, “Oh . . . Canada”

On this date in 1880 “O Canada” was first performed, ironically enough, at a Saint-Jean-Baptiste Day ceremony in Quebec.

Frye on his famous “garrison mentality” formulation of the Canadian character:

A garrison is a closely knit and beleaguered society, and its moral and social values are unquestionable.  In a perilous enterprise one does not discuss causes or motives: one is either a fighter or a deserter.  Here again we may turn to Pratt, with his infallible instinct for what is central in the Canadian imagination.  The societies in Pratt’s poems are always tense and tight groups engaged in war, rescue, martyrdom, or crisis, and the moral values expressed are simply those of that group.  In such a society the terror is not for the common enemy, even when the enemy is or seems victorious, as in the extermination of the Jesuit missionaries or the crew of Franklin…. The real terror comes with individual feels himself becoming an individual, pulling away from the group, losing the sense of driving power that the group gives him, aware of a conflict within himself far subtler than the struggle of morality against evil.  It is much easier to multiply garrisons, and when that happens, something anticultural comes into Canadian life, a dominating herd-mind in which nothing original can grow.  The intensity of the sectarian divisiveness of Canadian towns, both religious and political, is an example: what such groups represent, of course, vis-a-vis on another is “two solitudes,” the death of communication and dialogue.  Separatism, whether English or French, is culturally the most sterile of creeds. (“Conclusion to the First Edition of Literary History of Canada, CW 12, 351)

James Hansen

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jc4OzpgTOhk&feature=PlayList&p=B026A9066F0B1332&playnext_from=PL&playnext=1&index=17

James Hansen describing the censorship he was subject to during the Bush years on 60 Minutes

On this date in 1988, NASA scientist James Hansen testified to the U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural resources that it was 99% probable global warming had already begun.

He was of course 100% correct.

It’s 22 years later.  Look how little we’ve done to address the problem.  A major contributing cause is corporations like Koch Industries which fund global warming denialism.

Saturday Night at the Movies: “1984”

1984-movie-big-brother

The 1984 film adaptation of 1984.  I cannot embed this video, but you may watch it in very high quality and in full at Google Video here.

The film was actually shot in the industrial ruins of England during the same time period of the events depicted.  It’s a very powerful little movie made at a time when the Brits still made such movies.  Note the propaganda film being shown during the opening “two minutes hate” sequence.  The first minute of it sure looks familiar.  Authoritarianism of the left and authoritarianism of the right end up in much the same place.

After the jump, the 1954 BBC production of the novel, if you’d prefer something more vintage.

Continue reading

Salman Rushdie

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qf2eWKH-F4Y

Salman Rushdie on The Hour with George Stromboulopoulos

Today is Salman Rushdie‘s birthday (born 1947).  Rushdie, of course, was subjected to a death sentence by the Iranian Supreme Ayatollah Khomeini on February 14th, 1989 for his novel The Satanic Verses.  Frye makes reference to it in his last posthumously published work, The Double Vision.

I am, of course, isolating only one element in Christianity, but cruelty, terror, intolerance, and hatred within any religion always mean that God has been replaced by the devil, and such things are always accompanied by a false kind of literalism.  At present some other religions, notably Islam, are even less reassuring than our own.  As Marxist and American imperialisms decline, the Muslim world is emerging as the chief threat to world peace, and the spark-plug of its intransigence, so to speak, is its fundamentalism or false literalism of belief.  The same principle of demonic perversion applies here: when Khomeini gave the order to have Salman Rushdie murdered, he was turning the whole of the Koran into Satanic verses.  In our own culture, Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale depicts a future New England in which a reactionary religious movement has brought back the hysteria, bigotry, and sexual sadism of seventeenth-century Puritanism.  Such a development may seem unlikely just now, but the potential is all there.  (CW 4, 177-8)

Twenty years later, the potential only seems more potent.

TGIF: “The Jeannie Tate Show”

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Iw1uEVaQpA

The Jeannie Tate Show, with guest Bill Hader

Soccer mom Jeannie Tate (Liz Cackowski) hosts a talk show from her mini van in this WB web series.  Her troubled step-daughter and co-host, Tina Tate, is played by Parks and Recreation‘s Aubrey Plaza.

After the jump, the Hillary Clinton Election Special edition of the show, an extra credit project for Tina Tate’s civics class.

Jeannie Tate’s website here.

Aubrey Plaza’s video website here.  (Aubrey is scary funny.  Be sure to check out her parodies of MTV reality series in “Daddy’s Little Judge” and “Kaplowee.”)

Continue reading

Magna Carta

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yr7T4Jn8WgQ

The earliest surviving film adaptation of Shakespeare, an 1899 British production of King John.  (This clip cannot be embedded: hit the arrow and then hit the YouTube link that appears.)

On this date in 1215 King John of England put his seal on Magna Carta.

Shakespeare, of course, wrote a play about King John that makes no mention of Magna Carta.  Happily, Frye has a point or two to make about Shakespeare by way of King John.

The action of King John has proceeded only for a few lines when the king says:

Be thou as lightning in the eyes of France;
For ere thou can’st report I will be there,
The thunder of my cannon shall be heard.

King John, of course, had no cannon.  It is habitual for us to say the audience would never notice.  Audiences in fact have rather a quick ear for such things.  Or we may say that Shakespeare was in a hurry, and was unwilling to spoil his record of never blotting a line.  The assumption that Shakespeare was a hasty and slapdash writer has often been made, by hasty and slapdash critics, but has never proved fruitful.  If we say that Shakespeare had more important things on his mind, we come closer to the truth: certainly the fine image of the thunderstorm is more important than fidelity to the date of the introduction of gunpowder.  But it is better to think of such anachronism positively and functionally, as helping to univeralize an historical period, as representing a typical rather than a particular event.  The past is blended with the present, and event and audience are linked in the same community. (A Natural Perspective, 20)