Frye Quote of the Day: Putting “the watchdog of consciousness to sleep”

Saman Mohammdi cites Frye to characterize the rhetorical abuse of language in current political discourse. The entire article is here.

Canadian literary critic Northrop Frye said that words convey cultural and societal myths and make particular ideological beliefs hold sway over people’s minds. In his book Words with Power Frye noted the power of language to establish certain myths in a society and enable those myths to be passed on to future generations, writing:

Myth loses its ideological function except for what is taken over and adapted by logos . Myths that are no longer believed, no longer connected with cult or ritual, become purely literary; myths that retain a special status in society are translated into logos language, and are taught and learned in that form. (2).

The neoconservatives and other cliques who work for Washington’s hidden establishment have exploited the power of myth and the dark power of words to pursue criminal goals both inside America and in the Middle East. But all this is well known by political spin doctors and directors of political campaigns. Barack Obama would never have been elected President if he did not cunningly exploit the power of rhetoric and repeat universal words like “hope” and “change” to hypnotize voters and get them to think positively about him. He is slick, but not wise. A wise man would never have chosen to be the spokesperson for America’s plutocratic elite and carry out their criminal agenda.

Frye wrote about the politician’s misuse of rhetoric to captivate the crowd and put it in a state of submissiveness. He said:

When the rhetorical occasion narrows down from the historical to the immediate, as at rallies and pep talks, we begin to see features in rhetoric that account for the suspicion, even contempt, with which it was regarded so often by Plato and Aristotle. Let us take a rhetorical situation at its worst. In intensive rhetoric with a short-term aim, there is a deliberate attempt to put the watchdog of consciousness to sleep, and the steady battering of consciousness becomes hypnotic, as the metaphor of “swaying” an audience suggests. A repetition of cliché phrases is designed to bring about a form of dissociation. The dead end of all this is the semi-autonomous monster called the mob, of which the speaker is now the shrieking head. For a mob the kind of independent judgement appealed by dialectic is an act of open defiance, and is normally treated as such. (3).

Obama’s mob, like Bush’s mob, and Palin-McCain’s mob, have no idea who or what they are supporting because they want to cheer on their leaders instead of ask serious questions about their background, philosophy, and political programs. They are totally identified with them. When someone points out to them that they have been betrayed by the entire political establishment, republican and democrat alike, they half-agree, calling the other side evil, and continue to worship their chosen leader. They view anybody who questions the word or morality of their leader as a threat to their existence. Rather than engage in a debate with people who have a different opinion they resort to all sorts of childish tactics like calling them a “conspiracy theorist,” an “extremist,” and even a “traitor” without any evidence to support their statements. They don’t have any idea what these words were designed for but they repeat them anyway to silence critics and shut down debate.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

5 thoughts on “Frye Quote of the Day: Putting “the watchdog of consciousness to sleep”

  1. Veronica Abbass

    According to Mohammdi, People “don’t have any idea what these words [conspiracy theorist, extremist and traitor] were designed for but they repeat them anyway to silence critics and shut down debate.” Most people do know that these words are emotive and that’s why they use them against others.

    Saman Mohammdi’s article is very disturbing, especially because he uses Frye to support his argument. Where Frye is reasonable and objective, Mohammdi’s argument is subjective, ad hominem and rife with conspiracy theories. He claims, “Millions of people in America, Canada, England, and other Western countries know 9/11 was an inside job because they have researched the evidence and followed the rabbit hole to the depths of evil and treachery,” but provides no support for his claim.

    1. Michael Happy

      Hi Veronica. I scanned the article quickly and assumed that his estimation is ironic: they “know” because the discourse is so poisoned by irresponsible rhetoric. However, even if this is a misreading, we’d still post the link because it is a Frye citation and it will always be worth seeing where he is cited, how and why. It’s no surprise to me that he, like all great thinkers, might be misappropriated from time to time.

  2. Jim Racobs

    Thank you, Veronica. I also found the article disturbing & completely lacking in any evidentiary foundation. It may be worth seeing how Frye can be used & misused, but in a case like this I suggest including a disclaimer as to the substance of the article.

    1. Michael Happy

      The point is taken, Jim. The editorial intention is to post whenever Frye is significantly quoted as a matter of scholarly interest. However, as I do not hesitate to include editorial comment in other situations, I should perhaps do so here.

      However, I should also add that the manifest value of the exercise in this case has been to generate comment and discussion, which, to my mind, is the most valuable thing about a daily blog aspect to the website.

  3. Jim Racobs

    And I should have said–thank you, Michael (& other posters), for the blog. I always look forward to reading it.


Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *