We are glad to announce that the Centre for Comparative Literature has been saved. The proposed “School of Languages and Literatures at the University of Toronto” is no longer part of the university’s academic plan. An official announcement will be made later in the week. When this information becomes available, we will post it here.
Daily Archives: October 27, 2010
Quote of the Day: The Imagination and the Electoral Process
From “The Vocation of Eloquence” in The Educated Imagination:
“During an election campaign, politicians project various images on us and make speeches which we know to be at best a carefully selected part of the truth. We tend to look down on the person who responds to such appeals emotionally: we feel he’s behaving childishly and like an irresponsible citizen if he allows himself to be stampeded . . . What the responsible citizen uses is his imagination, not believing anybody literally, but voting for the man or party that corresponds most closely, or least remotely, to his vision of the society he wants to live in. The fundamental job of the imagination in ordinary life, then, is to produce, out of the society we live in, a vision of the society we want to live in.” (85-6)
Early Voting: What Does It Mean?
Easily the funniest Simpson’s bit in more than a decade: Homer tries to vote for Obama on a rigged voting machine. (Click on the image above and hit the YouTube link.)
Michael P. McDonald has posted the numbers for early voting in the midterms. It’s a complex situation with lots of variables, but the Democrats seem to enjoy the edge for those opting to vote early, which may be a good sign for overall voter turnout. I have seen suggestions that this phenomenon may be the Obama effect: his campaigning has been strong enough that he’s put people in the mood to vote early; particularly because, as we know, long lines seem always to occur exclusively in Democratic districts on election day, and that people of color are more susceptible to some form of harassment by local and state police when they try to get to the polls. As McDonald points out, this does not necessarily mean that Democrats will prevail on election day, but that it might not be the bloodletting that has Republicans smacking their lips.
A sample from McDonald’s article:
We appear to have entered a new era of early voting where Democrats are the ones more likely to vote early. The 2010 early voting numbers are better for Democrats than 2006 but are better for Republicans than 2008. Not surprisingly, Democrats are comparing the current numbers to 2006 while Republicans are comparing to 2008. We are likely somewhere in-between 2006 and 2008, but we do not know by how much, which leaves ample room for both parties to spin.
If voting behavior changed in 2010, a hanging question is why? Why would Democrats now be of the type more likely to vote early? I offer two plausible explanations. First, that Democrats learned about early voting options in their state and like using it. This may be particularly true for states that offer in-person early voting at special polling places, since there is plenty of evidence that this is the favored voting method for Democrats. Second, that Democrats developed early voter mobilization organizations in 2008 that they are carrying forward to 2010. I suspect both explanations contribute to the story.
Chart of the Day: Transparency International’s Corruption Index, 2010
A bigger, interactive version of the chart, as well as rankings, here. Denmark, New Zealand and Singapore are at the top of the clean list. Canada’s at number six. The U.S. is at number 22, just edging out Uruguay, France and Estonia.
Today is Dutch humanist and theologian Erasmus‘ birthday (1466-1536).
Frye in The Great Code on Erasmus and the always troublesome interpretation of the Gospel of John’s “In the beginning was the Word”:
Erasmus, in the Latin translation appended to his edition of the Greek New Testament, renders “In the beginning was the Word” as “In principio erat sermo.” This is purely a metonymic translation: in the beginning, Erasmus assumes, was the infinite mind, with its interlocking thoughts and ideas out of which the creative words emerged. Erasmus is clearly more influenced than [St.] Jerome by the later Greek history of the word [i.e. logos]. It would be cheap parody to say that Erasmus really means “In the beginning was continuous prose,” but the link between his “sermo” and the development of continuous prose is there nonetheless. (18)